Bt Corn Mainstreamed

This article explores the use of genetically modified Bt corn in the Philippines. The use of such corn was allowed beginning in December of 2002. Since that time, the area planted in biotech corn has reached a total of 702,000 hectares, involving 400,000 farming families. According to the Philippines Statistics Authority, 70 percent of the total corn harvested in the country is Bt corn. Dr. Randy A. Hautea, the global coordinator and Southeast Asia director of the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, said, the upward trajectory in adoption of biotech corn “reflects the significant and consistent benefits generated by biotech maize to farmers here. About 65 percent of the total yellow corn of the country is actually GM, the 350,000 to 400,000 farming families are now directly dependent on GM corn production.” Dr. Cleofe S. Torres, of the UPLB-College of Development Communication, said research has shown that farmers’ incomes tripled with Bt corn as compared to traditional corn.

Source: Sun Star Davao (7 Aug 2016)
Author: Ace June Rell S. Perez

For more, please contact Meridian Institute 8 August 2016  Food security and AgBiotech News

107 Nobel laureates sign letter blasting Greenpeace over GMOs

More than 100 Nobel laureates have signed a letter urging Greenpeace to end its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The letter asks Greenpeace to cease its efforts to block introduction of a genetically engineered strain of rice that supporters say could reduce Vitamin-A deficiencies causing blindness and death in children in the developing world.

“We urge Greenpeace and its supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with crops and foods improved through biotechnology, recognize the findings of authoritative scientific bodies and regulatory agencies, and abandon their campaign against ‘GMOs’ in general and Golden Rice in particular,” the letter states.

The letter campaign was organized by Richard Roberts, chief scientific officer of New England Biolabs and, with Phillip Sharp, the winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine for the discovery of genetic sequences known as introns. The campaign has a website,supportprecisionagriculture.org, that includes a running list of the signatories, and the group plans to hold a news conference Thursday morning at the National Press Club in Washington.

“We’re scientists. We understand the logic of science. It’s easy to see what Greenpeace is doing is damaging and is anti-science,” Roberts told The Washington Post. “Greenpeace initially, and then some of their allies, deliberately went out of their way to scare people. It was a way for them to raise money for their cause.”

 

For more, please visit

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/29/more-than-100-nobel-laureates-take-on-greenpeace-over-gmo-stance/

EIS soon on Glyphosate

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS) Biotechnology Regulatory Services (BRS) of the USA announces an  intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts that may result from the approval of a petition for deregulation of a creeping bentgrass genetically engineered for glyphosate resistance.                

The public is  requested to  review ‘our Notice of Intent (NOI) and provide comment to help us identify potential issues and impacts that APHIS should consider in our evaluation of the petition from Scotts Company and Monsanto Company. The NOI will be published in the Federal Register in the coming days’.

APHIS will consider all public input submitted during the 30-day comment period on the NOI and use the information as we work to complete, and then publish, the draft EIS

8/2016

Mycotoxin and Yield:Is AZOMITE the bullet solution for farmers ??

An organic intervention called ‘Azomite’ is being marketed as effective in reducing mycotoxin contamination and increasing the yield of agricultural products. It is said to be a natural source of minerals  and trace elements , certified organic  and capable of increasing growth of crop and livestock

For more on this , please visit www.azomite.com/

 

DF 6/16

 

Scientist Who Found Gluten Sensitivity Now Says it Doesn’t Exist

Phillip Schneider, Staff
Waking Times

Over 18 million people are said to have some intolerance to gluten, the sticky protein that can be found in breads, barley, and other wheat products. But how scientifically grounded is this sudden wave of large-scale gluten intolerance? As it turns out, it may not be gluten that is triggering health problems, but a reaction to agrochemicals being used in the harvesting of wheat.

Gluten is a protein composite that acts as a glue for bread, holding it together and giving it that fluffy, chewy texture that people enjoy. It is also used as a chewy meat substitute called seitan, widely used by vegetarians and vegans. Although some experts believe that only 1 percent of Americans have Celiac Disease, the auto-immune disorder that results in gluten intolerance, 18 percent of adults now reportedly regularly purchase gluten-free foods and about 30 percent say they want to eat less gluten.

In 2011, an Australian scientist named Peter Gibson at Monash University conducted an experiment to determine whether gluten in the diet can cause gastrointestinal distress in people who did not have celiac disease. When experiments confirmed this hypothesis, they named this condition ‘non-celiac gluten sensitivity‘ or NCGS, thus beginning the gluten-free trend, which has resulted in an estimated $15 billion industry by 2016.

Gibson was not satisfied with his findings, however, and because of how common gluten is in the diets of so many people, both modern and historically, he wanted to know why and how gluten could be causing this reaction in people who were not suffering from celiac disease. Consequently, he decided to take his research to a new level and conduct an experiment more rigorous than anything typically found in nutritional studies.

For this new experiment, Gibson sought out 37 self-identified gluten sensitive patients. The study was done double-blind with subjects that had NCGS and irritable bowel syndrome, but not celiac disease. For two weeks, the patients were given high-gluten, low-gluten, and no-gluten meals (as the control group), followed by a two-week “washout” period.

The findings of the study showed that although in opposition to the results found in the first experiment, gluten intolerance actually does not exist in people without celiac disease.third study, also by Gibson, further supports these findings, suggesting perhaps that much of what we see as gluten sensitivity is psychosomatic.

“In contrast to our first study… we could find absolutely no specific response to gluten,” – Dr. Peter Gibson

It May Not Be The Gluten – But Don’t Eat That Wheat Too Soon

Although gluten is no longer believed to be the culprit of health problems reportedly associated with consuming glutenous wheat, that does not mean that conventionally grown wheat is completely safe to eat. In fact, until 2005, GMO wheat was being tested in 16 states, and is known to have escaped testings grounds, genetically polluting nearby fields via airborne seeds and cross-pollination.

“Further testing by USDA laboratories indicates the presence of the same GE glyphosate-resistant wheat variety that Monsanto was authorized to field test in 16 states from 1998 to 2005.” – USDA, reported by Natural News

In addition, even non-GMO wheat is drenched with glyphosate  just days before harvest, because, as it turns out, wheat fields produce slightly more seed when sprayed with this poison 7-10 days before harvest, as researched by Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT.

“It ‘goes to seed’ as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed.” Dr. Seneff

Not only has glyphosate been found to be a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization, but has been linked to a variety of other health issues including depression, diabetes and you guessed it, celiac disease and gluten intoleranceThis study from 2013 shows that fish exposed to glyphosate develop digestive issues similar to celiac disease.

“If Glyphosate ends up in bread it’s impossible for people to avoid it, unless they are eating organic. On the other hand, farmers could easily choose not to use Glyphosate as a spray on wheat crops – just before they are harvested. This is why the Soil Association is calling for the immediate ending of the use of Glyphosate sprays on wheat destined for use in bread.” – Peter Melchett of the Soil Association

Conclusion

It is true that not every food fad ends up being true. However, we should still take caution when choosing the foods we feed our families. Although it has been found that gluten itself is not causing an intolerance in people without celiac disease, there are still other issues with wheat production that we need to be aware of. Get your wheat from local, organic farms when possible and do what you can to avoid Monsanto and other pesticide company’s chemical toxins finding their way into your body.

Read more articles from Phillip Schneider.

 

About the Author

Phillip Schneider is a student and a contributing author to Waking Times.

 

Is there any Doomsday Seed Vault In the Arctic ???

 

Both curious and exciting  !!!!!!!!

. The vault is expected to  contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future,’ according to the Norwegian government. Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture.

An Exclusive You Have To See: The Last Frontier of Free Press Is Here! No More Censorship, Unlike YouTube and Others!

or  Visit  this site for more =http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/02/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-bill-gates-rockefeller-and-gmo-giants-monsanto-syngenta-know-something-we-dont-3-3308142.html

Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:55

 

DF

 

Trial Of New Genetically Modified Rice In Nigeria

 

Summary posted by Meridian on 12/14/2015

Source: Omojuwa.com (14 Dec 2015)

Author(s): May Mary

A new genetically modified (GM) rice has been approved for trial by the Nigerian National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA). Rufus Ebegba, the director-general of the agency, said the trial of the rice, which is more efficient with regard to nitrogen and water, would occur at the National Cereals Research Institute in Niger. The agency has also given approval for confined field trials of cassava with increased levels of vitamin A, he added. Ebegba said all companies and institutions involved in biotechnology must register with the agency, as it will begin prosecution of unregistered companies in January. “The National Biosafety Agency Act is the only safety net and valve in the adoption of modern biotechnology and the use of GMOs for national development. The agency has the capacity to give Nigeria the desired holistic biosafety in a transparent manner, so that the nation can benefit maximally from modern biotechnology without compromising the environment and human health.”

The original article may still be available at http://omojuwa.com/2015/12/biosafety-agency-approves-trial-of-new-genetically-modified-rice-in-nigeria/

Genetic Tool to Help Feed the World

Source: Science Network Western Australia (27 Feb 2016)/Meridian Institute
Author: Geoff Vivian
Researchers at the University of Western Australia have compiled an easily-accessible database of food crop proteins, called CropPAL (Crop Proteins with Annotated Locations), which they hope will eliminate much of the time and expense spent developing new crop varieties. The database contains extensive information about where specific proteins occur within wheat, barley, rice and maize cells. Cornelia Hooper, the lead investigator, said, “We’re also hoping to build collaborations with people from the biotechnology field to use this data for breeding crops.” Knowledge of a protein found in one plant species, the researchers say, could help a plant breeder or biotechnologist understand the protein’s function when it occurs in another species, or help them better target a breeding program. The team plans to add grape, soybean, tomato, potato, canola, sorghum and banana to the database this year. more

ZIKA, A HOAX ???

Zika has been known about since 1947. It has never been considered a health threat. It has been linked to mild transient illness with few symptoms. So, in that regard, it’s an absurd candidate for causing microcephaly and brain damage.

There was no reason to assert that Zika was the cause of microcephaly in the first place. It was all hype and no science.

So in Brazil, instead of obsessively looking for one cause of “microcephaly,” true researchers would be looking for multiple causes where, in general, brain and nervous-system damage is the result.

Causes such as? Toxic pesticides, including Roundup and atrazine. Brazil uses more pesticides than any nation in the world, and many of these chemicals are banned in other countries.

Toxic vaccines—for example, the like the one  which was recommended to pregnant women in Brazil in 2014. The MMR vaccine. Other vaccines. Look, for example, at aluminum ingredients, which cross the blood-brain barrier and are neurotoxic.

Genetically-engineered mosquitoes, released to combat mosquitoes that carry dengue fever. No human health studies were done.

Anti-mosquito sprays.

Chemicals used to fumigate public places.

The mosquito-killing insecticide, pyroproxyfen, which has been dumped in water supplies.

And of course, those traditional immune-system destroyers, severe malnutrition, lack of basic sanitation, overcrowding, and stolen farm land.

There are other potential causes. For further readings please visit

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/02/16/zika-the-essence-of-the-hoax/